📉

AI2152 - Quantitative Methods Applied to Real Estate

Av: Björn Andrén & Ulf Nilsson

Formler som använts under tidigare tentor

Annuity

Present Value Annuity Cashflows
Present Value Annuity Cashflows

Variance

image

Present Value

Present Value
Present Value

Future Value of Cash today

Cash (C0), discount rate, n = time
Cash (C0), discount rate, n = time

IRR (Internal Rate of Return)

OBS! In excel CF0 needs to be negative
OBS! In excel CF0 needs to be negative

Price Elasticity (Midpoint method)

The result indicates a 1% change in price will change the quantity by x %.
image

Multipel R, R-Square, Adjusted R-Square

image

Quantity Theory of Money

image
image

Tenta 2021 October

Question 1. Calculate the present value of Annuity cashflows and a Bonus payment

Your investment pays you annual cash flows of $25 000 for the next 40 years. Year 40, your investment also pays you $500 000 (in addition to the $25 000). As usual all payments occur at the end of each year. Your required rate of return (the discount rate) is 5.5%. The present value of the cash flow is ___

Combine two formulas

Annuity

image

Present Value of future payment

image
Given
Acronym
Annual Cashflow
25 000
CF
Bonus Payment Year 40
500 000
CFt
Time Period Years
40
T
Rate of Return
5,5%
r
🧠
Present Value = (Annuity Cashflows) + (Present Value of Bonus payment) → Present Value = CF*1/r*(1-(1/((1+r)^T))) + CFT/((1+r)^T)
Answer

Question 2 - Calculate the constant cashflow growth in perpetuity

You assume that your new investment will generate annual cash flow forever (in perpetuity). Next year (year one) your investment will pay you $5 million. Thereafter, you assume that the yearly payments grow with an incredible (according to you) constant annual growth rate in perpetuity. Your required rate of return (the discount rate) is 12%. The present value of the growing cash flow is $62 500 000. Then the constant annual growth rate must be_____.
Given
Acronym
Year One CF1
$5 000 000
CF1
Required Rate of Return (Discount Rate)
12%
r
Present Value of the growing Cashflow
$62 500 000
PV
Constant growth rate
(?)%
g

Present Value of growing cashflow in perpetuity

image

(It’s the last part of the formula we need, since they want us to calculate g)

🧠
PV = CF1/(r-g) → g = -((CF1/PV)-r)
g = 4%
Answer

Question 3 - Expected IRR, Risk analysis, Variance, Standard Deviation

A property can be purchased for 12 000 000 today (USD). A real estate analyst who likes risk analysis is analyzing the expected IRR, and the risk measured as the standard deviation, of the real estate investment by projecting five different scenarios as follows: Severe recession: NOI will be 800 000 the first year, and then decrease 4.5 percent per year until year six. The property will sell for 9 000 000 in year six. The probability for this scenario is 10 percent. Moderate recession: NOI will be 800 000 the first year, and then decrease 2.5 percent per year until year six. The property will sell for 10 000 000 in year six. The probability for this scenario is 15 percent. Baseline forecast: NOI will be level 800 000 per year for the next six years. The property will sell for 13 000 000 in year six. The probability for this scenario is 40 percent. Moderate expansion: NOI will be 800 000 the first year, and then increase by 2.0 percent per year until year six. The property will sell for 14 000 000 in year six. The probability for this scenario is 30 percent. Strong boom expansion: NOI will be 800 000 the first year, and then increase 4.0 percent per year until year six. The property will sell for 15 000 000 in year six. The probability for this scenario is 5 percent.

Given from the question

Scenario Prob. (%)
Growth Rate (r)
Salvage Value (Sale Year 6)
Severe recession
10%
-4,5%
9 000 000
Moderate recession
15%
-2,5%
10 000 000
Baseline forecast
40%
0%
13 000 000
Moderate expansion
30%
+2%
14 000 000
Strong boom expansion
5%
+4%
15 000 000
Scenario Prob. (%)
NOI Year Zero
NOI Y1
NOI Y2
NOI Y3
NOI Y4
NOI Y5
1️⃣ NOI Y6 (Sale + CF6)
2️⃣ IRR Scenarios
4️⃣ Scenario Variance
Severe recession
10%
-12 000 000
800 000
764 000
729 620
696 787
665 432
9 635 487
2,01%
0,0266%
Moderate recession
15%
-12 000 000
800 000
780 000
764 400
749 112,00
734 130
10 719 447
3,80%
0,0170%
Baseline forecast
40%
-12 000 000
800 000
800 000
800 000
800 000
800 000
13 800 000
7,81%
0,0016%
Moderate expansion
30%
-12 000 000
800 000
816 000
832 320
848966
865 946
14 883 265
9,18%
0,0121%
Strong boom expansion
5%
-12 000 000
800 000
832 000
865 280
899891
935 887
15 973 322
10,49%
0,0055%
3️⃣ Mean IRR (Expected IRR)
7,173% ✅

1️⃣ Future Value Cashflow

To calculate NOI for year 1→6

image

2️⃣ Calculate IRR for all scenarios📗

=IRR((NOI Year Zero:NOIY6))

Obs → NOI Year zero måste vara negativt för att IRR formeln ska funka i excel

3️⃣  Calculate Mean IRR (Expected IRR) 📗

The sum of all scenarios based on their probability (Scenario probability)*(Case IRR)

=SUMPRODUCT(Scenario Prob(1->5);IRR(1->5))

4️⃣ Calculate Variance for each Case📗

=Scenario Prob.*((IRR for case)-(expected IRR))^2

5️⃣ Calculate Variance of Scenarios 📗

=sum(all case Variances) --> Variance

6️⃣ Standard Deviation 📗

=SQRT(Variance)

5️⃣ Variance
0,0628%
6️⃣ Standard Deviation
2,506% ✅
Standard Deviation = 2,506%, Expected IRR = 7,173%
Answer

Question 4 - Expected NPV based on 5 Scenarios

If the required rate of return (the discount rate) is 10 % for each of the five scenarios in question 10, then the expected NPV is____.
Scenario Prob. (%)
NOI Year Zero
NOI Y1
NOI Y2
NOI Y3
NOI Y4
NOI Y5
NOI Y6 Sale + CF6
1️⃣ Net Present Value
Severe recession
10%
-12 000 000
800 000
764 000
729 620
696 787
665 432
9 635 487
-3 765 070
Moderate recession
15%
-12 000 000
800 000
780 000
764 400
749 112,00
734 130
10 719 447
-3 035 455
Baseline forecast
40%
-12 000 000
800 000
800 000
800 000
800 000
800 000
13 800 000
-1 177 630
Moderate expansion
30%
-12 000 000
800 000
816 000
832 320
848966
865 946
14 883 265
-454 258
Strong boom expansion
5%
-12 000 000
800 000
832 000
865 280
899891
935 887
15 973 322
277 248
Given
Acronym
Required rate of Return (Discount Rate)
10%
i (r otherwise)
Time Period
6 Years
t = 0→6
NOI Year 0 → Year 6
(See table above)
Rt

1️⃣ Calculate Net Present Value 📗

image

Net present Value = NOIY0 + (NOIY1/((1+r)^(1)) … (NOIY6/((1+r)^(6))

2️⃣ Calculate Expected Mean NPV 📗

For scenario analysis you get Expected Mean NPV based on the probability of each scenario.

=SUMPRODUCT((Scenario Prob(1->5);NPV(1->5))

=SUMPRODUCT((Prob1:Prob5;NPV1:NPV5)

Expected Mean NPV = -1 425 292 USD
Answer

Question 5 - Price Elasticity of rent price and apartment suppy

Assume that an apartment rents for $950 per month and at that price the landlord rents out 12 000. When the price increases to $1 000 per month, the landlord supplies 15 000 units into the market. What is the correct interpretation of the price elasticity of supply? Use the midpoint method for elasticity.
Before 1
After 2
Quantity
12 000 (q1)
15 000 (q2)
Price
950 (p1)
1000 (p2)

Formula Price Elasticity (Midpoint)

OBS - The result indicates a 1% change in price will change the quantity by x %.
OBS - The result indicates a 1% change in price will change the quantity by x %.
E = (0,22/0,05)% → E = 4,33%
The result indicates a 1% change in price will change the quantity by x %.
🧠
The answers are tricky E = 4,33% It’s positive, hence a decrease in price (-1%) will result in a (-4,33%) decrease in supply.

Answers

A) A 1% decrease in the rent (price) will result in a 4.33% decrease in the quantity supplied. ✅ B) A 10% decrease in the rent (price) will result in a 4.33% decrease in the quantity supplied. C) A 4.33% rise in rent (price) will result in increase in quantity supplied of 1 %. D) A 4.33% rise in rent (price) will result in increase in quantity supplied of 10 %. E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is close to be correct.

Questions 6, 7 & 8

Q7 - Maximum arithmetic mean quarterly return

The HPI data shows quarterly international nominal house price index series (levels, not percentage returns). For each country compute the quarterly simple returns. The country that has the highest (maximum) arithmetic mean quarterly return is________.

(Example of how to compute this in excel 📗 )

Australia 🇦🇺
Belgium 🇧🇪
Canada 🇨🇦
1975 Q1
7.60
15.18
16.23
1975 Q2
7.74
15.93
16.46
1975 Q3
8.04
16.74
17.17
1975 Q4
8.29
17.65
17.41
Calculated Q-Returns
Australia 🇦🇺
Belgium 🇧🇪
Canada 🇨🇦
1975 Q1
(Q2-Q1)/(Q1)
0.049
0.013
1975 Q2
(Q3-Q2)/Q2
0.05
0.043
1975 Q3
0.031
0.054
0.014
1975 Q4
0.034
0.057
0.013
Australia 🇦🇺
Belgium 🇧🇪
Canada 🇨🇦
Mean
=Average(Q1:Q4)
=Average(🇧🇪  Q1:Q4)
Max
=Max(”Select Mean Row”)

1️⃣ Calculate Quarterly Returns (Simple)📗

(Q2 Returns - Q1) / Q1

=(data Q(n+1)-data Q(n))/data Q(n)

2️⃣  Compute Arithmetic Mean📗

Arithmetic Mean = Average = Medelvärde

Beräkna medelvärdet för vardera land i excell 🇨🇦 🇧🇪 🇦🇺

=average(Select first Q: Last quarter data set)

3️⃣ Find Max “Medelvärde” mellan länderna 📗

=max(Select Cells mean Row)

(Kolla vilket land som har Maxvärdet - går att ctrl-f:a excel 😊  )

Resultat till vänster är ett metodexempel för hur man gör i Excell. För frågan har vi 25 länder och Quarterly returns från 1975→ 2021.
Answer

Q9 - Find Maximum and Minimum in a huge set of data

The lowest (minimum) and highest (maximum) simple return observed among all countries and quarters is _________.

1️⃣ Find Max and Min Value 📗

=max(All Monthly return cells for all countries)

=min(All Monthly return cells for all countries)

🧠
Big-brain Move → Select Cells with class 🎩  1. Välj första Cellen längst upp till vänster (Australien i detta fall) 2. Håll in (Ctrl/Cmnd+Shift) 3. Tryck på ➡️ tangenten (Släpp inte (Ctrl/Cmnd+Shift) 4. Tryck på ⬇️  tangenten (Släpp inte (Ctrl/Cmnd+Shift) 5. Voila alla celler som vi ska välja är valda
Max = 1,9267 → 192,67% Min = -0,174 → ‒17.4%
Answer

Q8 - Find the highest pairwise correlation coefficient of quarterly returns

The highest (maximum) pairwise correlation coefficient of quarterly returns is between?

1️⃣  Create a correlation chart for the monthly returns 📗

Tryck med musen 🐁 högst upp i excel menyn → Data → Data analysis → Correlation

image
⚠️
Ett nytt blad i excel skapas → Bladet blir inte automatiskt färglagt 🎨  Det nya bladet innehåller siffrorna

2️⃣ “Färglägg” bladet 🎨 

Tryck med musen 🐁 Home → Conditional Formatting → Color Scales → Välj en skala

Färgskalan gör att du enkelt kan se vilka värden som är högst och minst Du kan ta bort ettorna, men om du är färgblind är denna metod inge bra ☹️ (Kör max funktion och ctrl-f:a ) 
Max → Nere i högra hörnet → Croatien + Slovenien Min → Finns två som är extra röda, den till vänster är mindre → Switzerland + Nederländerna
Answer

Question 9 & 10

Publicly listed Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) have been a great investment for many years. The monthly historical REITs data is downloaded from the Monthly Index Values & Returns. We now focus on the index for All Equity Reits, Total Return and Index columns. See the yellow areas in column W and X.
image
image

Q9 - Compute hypothetical Returns on monthly historical REITs data

Suppose that you invested $10 000 in January 1998. What was the value of that investment in September 2021?

1️⃣  Add column next to Return column

2️⃣  Find Row that represents returns from Jan 1998

→ Row 323 in my excelfile

3️⃣  Input 10 000 in that cell

4️⃣  Feb 1998 is computed in picture → Then drag until September 2021

September 2021 → $82 022.
All answers
image

Q10 - Calculate Geometric Mean on Returns

For the entire time period, December 1971 to September 2021, what is the monthly geometric mean return?
🧠
För använda formeln “=Geomean” behöver alla värden vara positiva - Så hur löser man det?

1️⃣  Lägg till en Column för Geo mean

image

2️⃣  Första värdet börjar på 100 + r → Dra ned formeln hela vägen ner till september 2021

3️⃣  Använda Geomean formeln

=GEOMEAN(V11:V607)-100

OBS 🚧  Svaret är i % - Vi tar bort 100 för vi la till 100 i steg 1)

Geomean = 0,93 → 0,93%
Answer

Questions 11-13 - Chi-Square stuff

You want to study the market for exclusive loudspeakers. You have divided speakers into two categories: exclusive (above $3 000 for a pair of loudspeakers) and not exclusive (up to $3 000). You are interested to learn if there is a difference in the proportion of people who like the Dune (2021) movie and do not like the Dune (2021) movie who buy exclusive speakers. Based on a sample of people you have asked, you construct the following table:
Actual Data
Like Dune
Don’t like Dune
Total
Exclusive Speakers
108
95
203
Not exclusive Speakers
33
88
121
Total
141
183
324

Q11 - Calculate upper-tail critical Value from a Chi-Square Distribution

The upper-tail critical value from a chi-square distribution at the 0.01 level of significance is______.
🧠
To calculate a critical value of a chi-square distribution of OUR CURRENT data table we can use =chisq.inv.rt(alpha, df) in excel 📗
⚠️
This is OK Because of: critical value = inverse = inv upper-tail = right tail = rt alpha = significance level = 0,01 = 1% = 1 df = degrees of freedom = (columns - 1)*(rows -1) = 1
=chisq.inv.rt(1, 1) = 6,634 upper tail critical value
Answers

Q12 - Compute chi-square test statistic based on the collected Data

Referring to the Dune table, value of the chi-square test statistic is ______.
Actual Data
Like Dune
Don’t like Dune
Total
Exclusive Speakers
108
95
203
Not exclusive Speakers
33
88
121
Total
141
183
324
1️⃣ We can turn the original data into the chart below 👇
Actual Data Fractions
Like Dune
Don’t like Dune
Total
Exclusive Speakers
0,77
0,52
0,63
Not exclusive Speakers
0,23
0,48
0,37
Total
1
1
1
Predicted
Like Dune
Don’t like Dune
Total
Exclusive Speakers
88
115
203
Not exclusive Speakers
53
68
121
Total
141
183
324

2️⃣ From these tables we compute Chi-Square test statistic

Exclusive Speakers Who like Dune: ((108-88)^2)/88 = 4,37

Not exclusive Speakers Who like Dune: ((33-53)^2)53 = 7,33

Exclusive Speakers + Don’t like Dune : (95-115)^2/115 = 3,37

Not exclusive Speakers + Don’t like Dune = 5,65

Summan av dessa är Chi-Square test statistic

Chi-Square test statistic: 3,37 + 5,65 + 7,33 + 4,37 ~ 20.74
Answers

Q13 - Calculate P-Value of Chi-square test, Given chi test statistic

The conclusion for a Chi-square test would be that ______.
🧠
Från fråga 11 vet vi att 6,6 är “Critical Value” → Alla P-Värden större än 6,6 P-Value =chisq.Dist.RT(chi-t-statistic, df) Upper-tail = RT Df = Degrees of freedom = 1 P-Value =chisq.Dist.RT(20,74, 1) → 5,27012E-06 (Mycket mindre än 6,6)
Answers

Question 14 & 15

Model Selection Criteria

Model
AIC
SC
RMSE
1
- 3,55
-3,45
0,85
2
- 3,66
-3,49
0,82
3
- 3,15
-3,07
0,92
4
- 4,42
-4,28
0,97
5
- 4,08
-4,03
1,05
Suppose you have estimated five different (cross-sectional) econometric house price models and want to choose the one model you want to offer large commercial banks as the best model ever for predicting house prices based on their characteristics (so called hedonic house price models). ← The table summarizes the results for AIC, BIC and RMSE

Q14 - Which model should you choose based on the AIC criteria?

🧠
SC and AIC models should be as low as possible, negative is good. RMSE can’t become Negative, hence close to zero is the best.
Model 4 → AIC = -4,42
Answer

Q15 - Which model should you choose based on the RMSE criteria?

🧠
SC and AIC models should be as low as possible, negative is good. RMSE can’t become Negative, hence close to zero is the best.
Model 2 → RMSE = 0,82
Answers

Question 16 - Exogeneity vs Endogeneity, how does these affect covariance

In econometric modelling the assumption of strict exogeneity implies that_____.

Picture of Covariance with strict exogeneity in the middle.

image
🧠
Endogeneity broadly refers to situations in which an explanatory variable is correlated with the error term. Exogeneity is the opposite of endogeneity, which an explanatory term is not correlated with the error term. This means the Covariance would be 0 if it’s strict exogeneity.

Picture of Covariance with “strict exogeneity” in the middle.

Answers

A) cov(xi, ej) = 0: there is no correlation between the omitted factors (variables) associated with the observation j and the value of the explanatory variable for observation i. ✅ B) cov(xi, ej) ≠ 0: there is positive or negative correlation between the omitted factors (variables) associated with the observation j and the value of the explanatory variable for observation i. C) cov(xi, ej) > 0: there is strict positive correlation between the omitted factors (variables) associated with the observation j and the value of the explanatory variable for observation i D) cov(xi, ej) < 0: there is strict negative correlation between the omitted factors (variables) associated with the observation j and the value of the explanatory variable for observation i E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is correct.

Question 17, 19, 20 & 21 - Understanding regression

image
image

Q17 - Compute R-Square for the model

The R square for this model is closest to _________.
🧠
We can compute R-Square with “Multiple R” → (Multiple R)^2 = R-Square
0,7986^2 → 0.6377 = R-Square
Answer

Q18 - Compute the Standard Error for the regression model

The standard error of the regression is closest to _________.
Ulf Nilssons Magisk skiss
Ulf Nilssons Magisk skiss

1️⃣  Compute the Residual Error

Residual: 642-409 = 232

Residual Error = 232

2️⃣  Compute SSE/df

df = observations - Regression - 1 df = 2160 - 6

SSE: 232/2154 = 0,107

3️⃣ Compute the standard Error

Standard Error: Sqrt(SSE/df) Sqrt(0,107) = 0,32

Sqrt(0,107) = 0,32
Answer

Q19 - How to compute t-statistic for linear model

The t-statistic for the ln(SQFT) (see ln_sqft) is closest to_________.
🧠
t-statistic = (”ln_sqft_Coefficient”)/ (“ln_sqft_Standard_error”)
t-stat: 0,892479/0,015659 = 56,99
Answer

Q20 - Confidence interval for a variable in a linear model

The 95% confidence interval for β5 is closest to__________.
🧠
We have the t-stat for b5 (waterfront) - With the t-stat and standard error we can compute the coefficient.
t-stat
Standard error
Coefficient
Two Tailed Critical t
Interval
Given
6,682043
0,020207
6,68*0,02 👇
=T.INV.2T(5%;2154) 👇
=(Stand.err.)*(two-t Criticalt) 👇
Calculated
0,135024043
1,961065926
0,02*1,96 = 0,0396
🧠
95% confidence interval is closest to Lower = (Coefficient) - (Interval) → 0,1350 + 0,0396 = 0,1746 Upper = (Coefficient) + (Interval) → 0,1350 + 0,0396 = 0,0953
Answer

Q21 - How to interpret a linear model

Which of the following interpretations of the coefficient of WATERFRONT is most correct? A) A waterfront house in on average 1.35 times more expensive than not waterfront houses. B) A waterfront house in on average 13.5 % more expensive than not waterfront houses. C) A waterfront house in on average 13.5 % more expensive than traditional houses. D) A waterfront house in on average 135 % more expensive than not waterfront houses. E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is close to be correct.
🧠
We calculated the Waterfront Coefficient to 0,1350 → Waterfront is 1 or 0, there fore a waterfront house is 1*0,135 more expensive than a none waterfront house. Assuming the compared houses for other attributes are identical we can derive that it will be 13,5% more expensive.
B) A waterfront house in on average 13.5 % more expensive than not waterfront houses.
Frågor kvar att göra om omtenta sker