Av: Björn Andrén & Ulf Nilsson
Formler som använts under tidigare tentor
Annuity
Variance
Present Value
Future Value of Cash today
IRR (Internal Rate of Return)
Price Elasticity (Midpoint method)
The result indicates a 1% change in price will change the quantity by x %.
Multipel R, R-Square, Adjusted R-Square
Quantity Theory of Money
Tenta 2021 October
Question 1. Calculate the present value of Annuity cashflows and a Bonus payment
Your investment pays you annual cash flows of $25 000 for the next 40 years. Year 40, your investment also pays you $500 000 (in addition to the $25 000). As usual all payments occur at the end of each year. Your required rate of return (the discount rate) is 5.5%. The present value of the cash flow is ___
Combine two formulas
Annuity
Present Value of future payment
Given | Acronym | |
Annual Cashflow | 25 000 | CF |
Bonus Payment Year 40 | 500 000 | CFt |
Time Period Years | 40 | T |
Rate of Return | 5,5% | r |
Question 2 - Calculate the constant cashflow growth in perpetuity
You assume that your new investment will generate annual cash flow forever (in perpetuity). Next year (year one) your investment will pay you $5 million. Thereafter, you assume that the yearly payments grow with an incredible (according to you) constant annual growth rate in perpetuity. Your required rate of return (the discount rate) is 12%. The present value of the growing cash flow is $62 500 000. Then the constant annual growth rate must be_____.
Given | Acronym | |
Year One CF1 | $5 000 000 | CF1 |
Required Rate of Return
(Discount Rate) | 12% | r |
Present Value of the growing Cashflow | $62 500 000 | PV |
Constant growth rate | (?)% | g |
Present Value of growing cashflow in perpetuity
(It’s the last part of the formula we need, since they want us to calculate g)
Question 3 - Expected IRR, Risk analysis, Variance, Standard Deviation
A property can be purchased for 12 000 000 today (USD). A real estate analyst who likes risk analysis is analyzing the expected IRR, and the risk measured as the standard deviation, of the real estate investment by projecting five different scenarios as follows: Severe recession: NOI will be 800 000 the first year, and then decrease 4.5 percent per year until year six. The property will sell for 9 000 000 in year six. The probability for this scenario is 10 percent. Moderate recession: NOI will be 800 000 the first year, and then decrease 2.5 percent per year until year six. The property will sell for 10 000 000 in year six. The probability for this scenario is 15 percent. Baseline forecast: NOI will be level 800 000 per year for the next six years. The property will sell for 13 000 000 in year six. The probability for this scenario is 40 percent. Moderate expansion: NOI will be 800 000 the first year, and then increase by 2.0 percent per year until year six. The property will sell for 14 000 000 in year six. The probability for this scenario is 30 percent. Strong boom expansion: NOI will be 800 000 the first year, and then increase 4.0 percent per year until year six. The property will sell for 15 000 000 in year six. The probability for this scenario is 5 percent.
Given from the question
Scenario Prob. (%) | Growth Rate (r) | Salvage Value
(Sale Year 6) | |
Severe recession | 10% | -4,5% | 9 000 000 |
Moderate recession | 15% | -2,5% | 10 000 000 |
Baseline forecast | 40% | 0% | 13 000 000 |
Moderate expansion | 30% | +2% | 14 000 000 |
Strong boom expansion | 5% | +4% | 15 000 000 |
Scenario Prob. (%) | NOI Year Zero | NOI Y1 | NOI Y2 | NOI Y3 | NOI Y4 | NOI Y5 | 1️⃣ NOI Y6
(Sale + CF6) | 2️⃣ IRR Scenarios | 4️⃣ Scenario Variance | |
Severe recession | 10% | -12 000 000 | 800 000 | 764 000 | 729 620 | 696 787 | 665 432 | 9 635 487 | 2,01% | 0,0266% |
Moderate recession | 15% | -12 000 000 | 800 000 | 780 000 | 764 400 | 749 112,00 | 734 130 | 10 719 447 | 3,80% | 0,0170% |
Baseline forecast | 40% | -12 000 000 | 800 000 | 800 000 | 800 000 | 800 000 | 800 000 | 13 800 000 | 7,81% | 0,0016% |
Moderate expansion | 30% | -12 000 000 | 800 000 | 816 000 | 832 320 | 848966 | 865 946 | 14 883 265 | 9,18% | 0,0121% |
Strong boom expansion | 5% | -12 000 000 | 800 000 | 832 000 | 865 280 | 899891 | 935 887 | 15 973 322 | 10,49% | 0,0055% |
3️⃣ Mean IRR
(Expected IRR) | ||||||||||
7,173% ✅ |
1️⃣ Future Value Cashflow
To calculate NOI for year 1→6
2️⃣ Calculate IRR for all scenarios📗
=IRR((NOI Year Zero:NOIY6))
Obs → NOI Year zero måste vara negativt för att IRR formeln ska funka i excel
3️⃣ Calculate Mean IRR (Expected IRR) 📗
The sum of all scenarios based on their probability (Scenario probability)*(Case IRR)
=SUMPRODUCT(Scenario Prob(1->5);IRR(1->5))
4️⃣ Calculate Variance for each Case📗
=Scenario Prob.*((IRR for case)-(expected IRR))^2
5️⃣ Calculate Variance of Scenarios 📗
=sum(all case Variances) -->
Variance
6️⃣ Standard Deviation 📗
=SQRT(Variance)
5️⃣ Variance | 0,0628% |
6️⃣ Standard Deviation | 2,506% ✅ |
Question 4 - Expected NPV based on 5 Scenarios
If the required rate of return (the discount rate) is 10 % for each of the five scenarios in question 10, then the expected NPV is____.
Scenario Prob. (%) | NOI Year Zero | NOI Y1 | NOI Y2 | NOI Y3 | NOI Y4 | NOI Y5 | NOI Y6
Sale + CF6 | 1️⃣ Net Present Value | |
Severe recession | 10% | -12 000 000 | 800 000 | 764 000 | 729 620 | 696 787 | 665 432 | 9 635 487 | -3 765 070 |
Moderate recession | 15% | -12 000 000 | 800 000 | 780 000 | 764 400 | 749 112,00 | 734 130 | 10 719 447 | -3 035 455 |
Baseline forecast | 40% | -12 000 000 | 800 000 | 800 000 | 800 000 | 800 000 | 800 000 | 13 800 000 | -1 177 630 |
Moderate expansion | 30% | -12 000 000 | 800 000 | 816 000 | 832 320 | 848966 | 865 946 | 14 883 265 | -454 258 |
Strong boom expansion | 5% | -12 000 000 | 800 000 | 832 000 | 865 280 | 899891 | 935 887 | 15 973 322 | 277 248 |
Given | Acronym | |
Required rate of Return
(Discount Rate) | 10% | i (r otherwise) |
Time Period | 6 Years | t = 0→6 |
NOI Year 0 → Year 6 | (See table above) | Rt |
1️⃣ Calculate Net Present Value 📗
Net present Value = NOIY0 + (NOIY1/((1+r)^(1)) … (NOIY6/((1+r)^(6))
2️⃣ Calculate Expected Mean NPV 📗
For scenario analysis you get Expected Mean NPV based on the probability of each scenario.
=SUMPRODUCT((Scenario Prob(1->5);NPV(1->5))
=SUMPRODUCT((Prob1:Prob5;NPV1:NPV5)
Question 5 - Price Elasticity of rent price and apartment suppy
Assume that an apartment rents for $950 per month and at that price the landlord rents out 12 000. When the price increases to $1 000 per month, the landlord supplies 15 000 units into the market. What is the correct interpretation of the price elasticity of supply? Use the midpoint method for elasticity.
Before 1 | After 2 | |
Quantity | 12 000 (q1) | 15 000 (q2) |
Price | 950 (p1) | 1000 (p2) |
Formula Price Elasticity (Midpoint)
The result indicates a 1% change in price will change the quantity by x %.
Answers
A) A 1% decrease in the rent (price) will result in a 4.33% decrease in the quantity supplied. ✅ B) A 10% decrease in the rent (price) will result in a 4.33% decrease in the quantity supplied. C) A 4.33% rise in rent (price) will result in increase in quantity supplied of 1 %. D) A 4.33% rise in rent (price) will result in increase in quantity supplied of 10 %. E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is close to be correct.
Questions 6, 7 & 8
Q7 - Maximum arithmetic mean quarterly return
The HPI data shows quarterly international nominal house price index series (levels, not percentage returns). For each country compute the quarterly simple returns. The country that has the highest (maximum) arithmetic mean quarterly return is________.
(Example of how to compute this in excel 📗 )
Australia 🇦🇺 | Belgium 🇧🇪 | Canada 🇨🇦 | |
1975 Q1 | 7.60 | 15.18 | 16.23 |
1975 Q2 | 7.74 | 15.93 | 16.46 |
1975 Q3 | 8.04 | 16.74 | 17.17 |
1975 Q4 | 8.29 | 17.65 | 17.41 |
Calculated
Q-Returns | Australia 🇦🇺 | Belgium 🇧🇪 | Canada 🇨🇦 |
1975 Q1 | (Q2-Q1)/(Q1) | 0.049 | 0.013 |
1975 Q2 | (Q3-Q2)/Q2 | 0.05 | 0.043 |
1975 Q3 | 0.031 | 0.054 | 0.014 |
1975 Q4 | 0.034 | 0.057 | 0.013 |
Australia 🇦🇺 | Belgium 🇧🇪 | Canada 🇨🇦 | |
Mean | =Average(Q1:Q4) | =Average(🇧🇪 Q1:Q4) | |
Max | =Max(”Select Mean Row”) |
1️⃣ Calculate Quarterly Returns (Simple)📗
(Q2 Returns - Q1) / Q1
=(data Q(n+1)-data Q(n))/data Q(n)
2️⃣ Compute Arithmetic Mean📗
Arithmetic Mean = Average = Medelvärde
Beräkna medelvärdet för vardera land i excell 🇨🇦 🇧🇪 🇦🇺
=average(Select first Q: Last quarter data set)
3️⃣ Find Max “Medelvärde” mellan länderna 📗
=max(Select Cells mean Row)
(Kolla vilket land som har Maxvärdet - går att ctrl-f:a excel 😊 )
Resultat till vänster är ett metodexempel för hur man gör i Excell. För frågan har vi 25 länder och Quarterly returns från 1975→ 2021.
Q9 - Find Maximum and Minimum in a huge set of data
The lowest (minimum) and highest (maximum) simple return observed among all countries and quarters is _________.
1️⃣ Find Max and Min Value 📗
=max(All Monthly return cells for all countries)
=min(All Monthly return cells for all countries)
Q8 - Find the highest pairwise correlation coefficient of quarterly returns
The highest (maximum) pairwise correlation coefficient of quarterly returns is between?
1️⃣ Create a correlation chart for the monthly returns 📗
Tryck med musen 🐁 högst upp i excel menyn → Data → Data analysis → Correlation
2️⃣ “Färglägg” bladet 🎨
Tryck med musen 🐁 Home → Conditional Formatting → Color Scales → Välj en skala
Färgskalan gör att du enkelt kan se vilka värden som är högst och minst Du kan ta bort ettorna, men om du är färgblind är denna metod inge bra ☹️ (Kör max funktion och ctrl-f:a )
Question 9 & 10
Publicly listed Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) have been a great investment for many years. The monthly historical REITs data is downloaded from the Monthly Index Values & Returns. We now focus on the index for All Equity Reits, Total Return and Index columns. See the yellow areas in column W and X.
Q9 - Compute hypothetical Returns on monthly historical REITs data
Suppose that you invested $10 000 in January 1998. What was the value of that investment in September 2021?
1️⃣ Add column next to Return column
2️⃣ Find Row that represents returns from Jan 1998
→ Row 323 in my excelfile
3️⃣ Input 10 000 in that cell
4️⃣ Feb 1998 is computed in picture → Then drag until September 2021
Q10 - Calculate Geometric Mean on Returns
For the entire time period, December 1971 to September 2021, what is the monthly geometric mean return?
1️⃣ Lägg till en Column för Geo mean
2️⃣ Första värdet börjar på 100 + r → Dra ned formeln hela vägen ner till september 2021
3️⃣ Använda Geomean formeln
=GEOMEAN(V11:V607)-100
OBS 🚧 Svaret är i % - Vi tar bort 100 för vi la till 100 i steg 1)
Questions 11-13 - Chi-Square stuff
You want to study the market for exclusive loudspeakers. You have divided speakers into two categories: exclusive (above $3 000 for a pair of loudspeakers) and not exclusive (up to $3 000). You are interested to learn if there is a difference in the proportion of people who like the Dune (2021) movie and do not like the Dune (2021) movie who buy exclusive speakers. Based on a sample of people you have asked, you construct the following table:
Actual Data | Like Dune | Don’t like Dune | Total |
Exclusive Speakers | 108 | 95 | 203 |
Not exclusive Speakers | 33 | 88 | 121 |
Total | 141 | 183 | 324 |
Q11 - Calculate upper-tail critical Value from a Chi-Square Distribution
The upper-tail critical value from a chi-square distribution at the 0.01 level of significance is______.
=chisq.inv.rt(alpha, df)
in excel 📗inv
upper-tail = right tail = rt
alpha
= significance level = 0,01 = 1% = 1
df
= degrees of freedom = (columns - 1)*(rows -1) = 1
=chisq.inv.rt(1, 1)
= 6,634 upper tail critical valueQ12 - Compute chi-square test statistic based on the collected Data
Referring to the Dune table, value of the chi-square test statistic is ______.
Actual Data | Like Dune | Don’t like Dune | Total |
Exclusive Speakers | 108 | 95 | 203 |
Not exclusive Speakers | 33 | 88 | 121 |
Total | 141 | 183 | 324 |
Actual Data Fractions | Like Dune | Don’t like Dune | Total |
Exclusive Speakers | 0,77 | 0,52 | 0,63 |
Not exclusive Speakers | 0,23 | 0,48 | 0,37 |
Total | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Predicted | Like Dune | Don’t like Dune | Total |
Exclusive Speakers | 88 | 115 | 203 |
Not exclusive Speakers | 53 | 68 | 121 |
Total | 141 | 183 | 324 |
2️⃣ From these tables we compute Chi-Square test statistic
Exclusive Speakers Who like Dune: ((108-88)^2)/88 = 4,37
Not exclusive Speakers Who like Dune: ((33-53)^2)53 = 7,33
Exclusive Speakers + Don’t like Dune : (95-115)^2/115 = 3,37
Not exclusive Speakers + Don’t like Dune = 5,65
Summan av dessa är Chi-Square test statistic
Q13 - Calculate P-Value of Chi-square test, Given chi test statistic
The conclusion for a Chi-square test would be that ______.
=chisq.Dist.RT(chi-t-statistic, df)
Upper-tail = RT
Df = Degrees of freedom = 1
P-Value =chisq.Dist.RT(20,74, 1)
→ 5,27012E-06 (Mycket mindre än 6,6) Question 14 & 15
Model Selection Criteria
Model | AIC | SC | RMSE |
1 | - 3,55 | -3,45 | 0,85 |
2 | - 3,66 | -3,49 | 0,82 |
3 | - 3,15 | -3,07 | 0,92 |
4 | - 4,42 | -4,28 | 0,97 |
5 | - 4,08 | -4,03 | 1,05 |
Suppose you have estimated five different (cross-sectional) econometric house price models and want to choose the one model you want to offer large commercial banks as the best model ever for predicting house prices based on their characteristics (so called hedonic house price models). ← The table summarizes the results for AIC, BIC and RMSE
Q14 - Which model should you choose based on the AIC criteria?
Q15 - Which model should you choose based on the RMSE criteria?
Question 16 - Exogeneity vs Endogeneity, how does these affect covariance
In econometric modelling the assumption of strict exogeneity implies that_____.
Picture of Covariance with strict exogeneity in the middle.
← Picture of Covariance with “strict exogeneity” in the middle.
Answers
A) cov(xi, ej) = 0: there is no correlation between the omitted factors (variables) associated with the observation j and the value of the explanatory variable for observation i. ✅ B) cov(xi, ej) ≠ 0: there is positive or negative correlation between the omitted factors (variables) associated with the observation j and the value of the explanatory variable for observation i. C) cov(xi, ej) > 0: there is strict positive correlation between the omitted factors (variables) associated with the observation j and the value of the explanatory variable for observation i D) cov(xi, ej) < 0: there is strict negative correlation between the omitted factors (variables) associated with the observation j and the value of the explanatory variable for observation i E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is correct.
Question 17, 19, 20 & 21 - Understanding regression
Q17 - Compute R-Square for the model
The R square for this model is closest to _________.
Q18 - Compute the Standard Error for the regression model
The standard error of the regression is closest to _________.
1️⃣ Compute the Residual Error
Residual: 642-409 = 232
Residual Error = 232
2️⃣ Compute SSE/df
df = observations - Regression - 1 df = 2160 - 6
SSE: 232/2154 = 0,107
3️⃣ Compute the standard Error
Standard Error: Sqrt(SSE/df) Sqrt(0,107) = 0,32
Q19 - How to compute t-statistic for linear model
The t-statistic for the ln(SQFT) (see ln_sqft) is closest to_________.
Q20 - Confidence interval for a variable in a linear model
The 95% confidence interval for β5 is closest to__________.
t-stat | Standard error | Coefficient | Two Tailed Critical t | Interval | |
Given | 6,682043 | 0,020207 | 6,68*0,02 👇 | =T.INV.2T(5%;2154) 👇 | =(Stand.err.)*(two-t Criticalt) 👇 |
Calculated | 0,135024043 | 1,961065926 | 0,02*1,96 = 0,0396 |
Q21 - How to interpret a linear model
Which of the following interpretations of the coefficient of WATERFRONT is most correct? A) A waterfront house in on average 1.35 times more expensive than not waterfront houses. B) A waterfront house in on average 13.5 % more expensive than not waterfront houses. C) A waterfront house in on average 13.5 % more expensive than traditional houses. D) A waterfront house in on average 135 % more expensive than not waterfront houses. E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is close to be correct.